cartoon1

cartoon1

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

2 million Egyptians sign petition calling for a "no confidence" vote on Morsi

This could be the beginning of the end of the "Arab Spring" as long as Obama stays out of it.  Remember he never met a Muslim Brotherhood member he didn't like.

From NBC May 21 by Charlene Gubash

Egypt's 'rebels' gather millions of signatures to protest Morsi

CAIRO – Once again, a handful of activists has managed to galvanize and inspire Egypt’s grumbling masses in a way no opposition political parties have been able to.

Their concept is simple. They are inviting the Egyptian electorate to sign a petition expressing “no confidence” in President Mohamed Morsi, a move they hope will trigger early presidential elections.

The response has been eye-opening. So far, 6,000 volunteers for the grassroots campaign dubbed “Tamarod” or “Rebel” have collected over 2 million signatures, according to the group’s spokesman Mahmoud Badr. Egypt’s electorate numbers about 50 million, with half of those voting in the last presidential election.
The movement has grown quickly, with opposition parties announcing support, widespread press coverage and black and white leaflets plastered across nearly every Cairo neighborhood. The “Rebel” Facebook page has attracted 150,000 “likes” in one month.

At a busy intersection in Mohandiseen, an upper-middle class Cairo neighborhood, at least 20 people stopped last Thursday to sign the leaflets and jot down national ID numbers to verify their identity.
“Yesterday was even more crowded,” said Basma Sherif, as she handed out forms.

“There were accidents because people were leaving their cars in traffic to come and sign,” said Sherif, a 24-year-old insurance company employee.

People from all walks of life and throughout Egypt are signing the petition – from upper class educated elites to truck drivers and housekeepers – even people who voted for Morsi in the last election are now taking part in the campaign.

"People come from the cars to sign – poor, rich, middle class, everybody has one opinion,” said Sherif.

Read it all

Topless jihad activist arrested, may be charged with "provocative acts"



Ah yes, we all know the bare breast is the main cause of the fall of civilizations, and Amina Tyler therefore must be the next jinn, or satan-like spirit that is infecting Islam.

Maybe she could be thrown in a well to see if she floats, and if she does then she is guilty.  If she sinks she is innocent and she will be set free.  Uh, wait a minute...

From Al Arabiya May 21

Amina Tyler, Tunisia’s ‘topless jihad’ activist, caught and under arrest

After months of reportedly going into hiding, the outspoken Tunisian feminist who sparked a trend of “topless jihad” has been found and arrested by Tunisian authorities earlier this week and may be charged for conducting “provocative acts.”

Amina Tyler, 19, was found in the midst of police scuffles with hardline Salafist group Ansar al-Shariah in the central Tunisian city of Kairouan on Sunday.

Tyler previously described herself as a member of the Ukrainian feminist group Femen, which uses nudity in protests.

Witnesses said she allegedly scrawled “Femen” on the wall near the main mosque and may have intended to hang a banner on the building before an angry crowd gathered and started shouting at her to leave, according to The Associated Press.

Video posted by the Tunisian online Nawaat news site shows Tyler, with dyed blonde hair, clutching a banner and being hustled away by police and put into a van as residents chased her.

A local resident shouts at the camera: “She is dishonoring us. We will protect our town, but a dirty girl like her shouldn’t come among us.”

Read it all

The beard of jihad is worth 278K

U.S. Rep. Wants Combat Benefits for Fort Hood Victims
The beard, now with money


Would you believe Nidal Hasan, the Ft. Hood jihadist has been getting a paycheck since he murdered 13 and wounded over 30?  To the tune of 270,000 of your tax dollars he has been paid, and as long as he has not been convicted he will continue to receive his paycheck.

Feel better now?

From NBCDFW May 21 by Scott Friedman

Accused Fort Hood Shooter Paid $278,000 While Awaiting Trial

The Department of Defense confirms to NBC 5 Investigates that accused Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan has now been paid more than $278,000 since the Nov. 5, 2009 shooting that left 13 dead and 32 injured. The Army said under the Military Code of Justice, Hasan’s salary cannot be suspended unless he is proven guilty.

If Hasan had been a civilian defense department employee, NBC 5 Investigates has learned, the Army could have suspended his pay after just seven days.

Personnel rules for most civilian government workers allow for "indefinite suspensions" in cases "when the agency has reasonable cause to believe that the employee has committed a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed."

Meanwhile, more than three years later soldiers wounded in the mass shooting are fighting to receive the same pay and medical benefits given to those wounded in combat.

Retired Army Spc. Logan Burnett, a reservist who, in 2009, was soon to be deployed to Iraq, was shot three times when a gunman opened fire inside the Army Deployment Center.

“I honestly thought I was going to die in that building,” said Burnett. “Just blood everywhere and then the thought of -- that's my blood everywhere.”

Burnett nearly died. He's had more than a dozen surgeries since the shooting, and says post-traumatic stress still keeps him up at night.

Burnett is now fighting a new battle; only this one is against the U.S. Army.

The Army has not classified the wounds of the Ft. Hood victims as “combat related” and declines to label the shooting a “terrorist attack”,

The “combat related” designation is an important one, for without it Burnett and other shooting victims are not given combat-related pay, they are not eligible for Purple Heart retirement or medical benefits given to other soldiers wounded either at war or during the Sept. 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon.

As a result, Burnett, his wife Torey, and the families of other Fort Hood victims miss out on thousands of dollars of potential benefits and pay every year.

To Burnett the shooting felt like combat.

“You take three rounds and lose five good friends and watch seven other people get killed in front of you. Do you have another term that we can classify that as?” asked Burnett.

The Army has categorized the shooting as a case of “workplace violence.”

Can't call it what it is, that would insult Muslims and tarnish the good name of Islam.  Heh.

Read it all

British terrorist refuses to stand for judge, says his religion forbids it

I knew it.  Those pesky Mennonites, always going against the grain...wait, it's Islam?  I am surprised, after all it is the religion of peace.

From the Telegraph May 20 by Peter Bodkin

Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge

A MAN accused of rioting during last year's violent Muslim protests has been berated for his "disrespect" after refusing to stand before a magistrate at his court hearing.

Mohammed Issai Issaka, who was charged with riot, assaulting police and resisting arrest over the September incident, this morning said his religious beliefs stopped him for rising for the court - the standard practice whenever a judge or magistrate enters or leaves.

Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge repeatedly demanded Issaka stand for her, telling him she didn’t accept his refusal.

"You can tell me where it is in his religion that it says he cannot stand," she said to Issaka's lawyer, Stephen Hopper.

"I was a magistrate at Bankstown Court for four years and I have never had to deal with such disrespect."

The hearing had to be postponed for nearly half an hour after the prosecution and defence consulted Ms Milledge, with the case eventually continuing after Issaka waited outside the courtroom as everyone stood for the magistrate.

Read it all

Saturday, May 18, 2013

New DHS manual on Islam says to equate sharia law with violence violates the first amendment

WTF?  I read this and did a triple take.  To say that sharia law is violent and because of that it violates free speech rights is ridiculous.  Sharia law scholars all agree that parts of sharia law; stoning, amputation, execution by beheading are inherently violent, and by any standard they are, so why does DHS insist the opposite, and then threaten to penalize those who speak the truth?

Another trip down the rabbit hole...

From The Daily Caller May 17 by Charles C. Johnson

Homeland Security guidelines advise deference to pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists

The Department of Homeland Security, which under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists.

In a checklist obtained by The Daily Caller entitled “Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don’ts” the DHS’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of government legitimate.

This policy stands in stark contrast to the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis’ 2009 memo “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” [pdf], which warned of the dangers posed by pro-life advocates, critics of same-sex marriage and groups concerned with abiding by the U.S. Constitution, among others.

The advice of the Dos and Don’ts list is far more conciliatory. “Don’t use training that equates radical thought, religious expression, freedom to protest, or other constitutionally-protected activity, including disliking the U.S. government without being violent,” the manual’s authors write in a section on training being “sensitive to constitutional values.”

The manual, which was produced by an inter-agency working group from DHS and the National Counterterrorism Center, advises, “Trainers who equate the desire for Sharia law with criminal activity violate basic tenets of the First Amendment.”

(.) The Homeland Security document also seems to discount evidence unearthed by the Justice Department about the aims of some mainstream Muslim organizations, warning law enforcement not to rely on “unsubstantiated theories” and “conspiracies,” such as the belief that “many mainstream Muslim organizations have terrorist ties” or are “fronts for Islamic political organizations whose true desire is to establish Sharia law in America.”

The elephant in the room now has his own bedroom and has been accepted as part of the family.  We are doomed.

Read it all

Tanzania: Christian persecution heats up on mainland and islands off the coast; churches destroyed, parish members murdered including children

Zanzibar, a fabled city with a history of ancient proportions is the scene of Christian persecution.  Another city of the past is being torn asunder by Islamic doctrine, and the country will soon fall to the hands of Muhammads army.  When I think Zanzibar I think of Hope and Crosby, not jihad and sharia.  The Road to Zanzibar today is paved with the bones of the victims of jihad, and it is getting worse.

From Morningstar News May 18

Anti-Christian Hostility High in Zanzibar as Tanzania Mainland also Heats Up

ZANZIBAR, Tanzania (Morning Star News) – Islamic extremist attacks and land grabs on this semi-autonomous island off the coast of Tanzania have continued unabated even as violence has increased on the mainland.

The May 5 bombing of St. Joseph’s Roman Catholic Church in Arusha killed a 45-year-old woman, a 16-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl. Of the two Tanzanians and four foreigners arrested – now officially identified as one from Saudi Arabia and three from the United Arab Emirates – only one Tanzanian national reportedly remains in custody as a suspect.

While Islamic extremist activity has increased in Tanzania, Christians on the Zanzibar archipelago have recently suffered attacks by Islamists and the separatist group Uamsho (Re-awakening). Uamsho, the Association for Islamic Mobilization and Propagation, has issued explicit threats to Christians on Zanzibar Island since October 2012.

At midnight on April 20, Islamic extremists in Kianga, 16 kilometers (11 miles) from Zanzibar City, demolished most of the Pool of Siloam church building, a church leader said. Three suspects were arrested, only to be released after three days.

“When we tried to follow up the case, we found out that some of the information concerning the pulling down of the church was missing,” church pastor Israel Baraka Elijah told Morning Star News. “Hence, we decided to give up all together.”

Damages were estimated at $2,500, he added. Muslim extremists had attacked the church building before, setting part of it on fire on Feb. 19 and battering it with sledge hammers in November 2011.

"US Naval Academy Instructor Teaching On Behalf Of US Muslim Brotherhood"

This is one of the fruits of the Obama administrations insistence to scrub all references to the teachings of Islam that call for the conversion, subjugation or death of non-Muslims, and how jihadists routinely use the Qur'an and hadiths of Muhammad to justify their actions.  This new teaching system is similar to the course on Islam I am currently taking at Lane Community College.  The dark aspects of Islam are mentioned in passing, given no real weight against the "peaceful' version of Islam taught and brushed off as the actions of that "tiny minority of extremists" who are misunderstanding Islamic doctrine.  Our military is being led down a primrose path to their, and our doom.

From Global MB Watch May 14

US Naval Academy Instructor Teaching On Behalf Of US Muslim Brotherhood
According to promotional material, a United States Naval Academy professor is teaching on behalf of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a part of the US Muslim Brotherhood and where global Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi reportedly serves as a trustee. IIIT recently announced its Summer Students Program for 2013 to be held from May 26 – July 3. According to the IIIT announcement, one of the instructors for the program will be Professor Ermin Sinanovic, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland who will be teaching the following course titled “Muslim World Affairs”:
One of the other instructors at the IIIT summer program will be US Muslim Brotherhood leader Louay Safi, identified in the announcement as affiliated with the College of Islamic Studies of the Qatar Foundation. In 2009 Louay Safi, also an official at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), was at the center of a controversy when it was learned that the US Defense Department brought him to Fort Hood as an instructor and that he had been lecturing on Islam to troops in Fort Hood who were about to deploy to Afghanistan. In February 2010, the activities and lectures of Dr. Safi on all military bases were suspended pending a criminal inquiry by the U.S. military. A shooting took place at Fort Hood near Killeen, Texas on November 5, 2009 in which a single gunman killed 13 people and over 30 people were injured in the worst shooting ever to take place on an American military base. The only suspect in the shooting is Nidal Malik Hasan, a 39-year-old U.S. Army major serving as a psychiatrist. Dr. Safi has also been recently identified as a leading member of the Syrian National Council, a Syrian opposition group dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Another instructor at the program will be Jasser Aouda (aka Jasser Auda), also identified as affiliated with the College of Islamic Studies of the Qatar Foundation. Dr Auda is best known as a a key advisor to Imamn Feisal Rauf, in turn known for his attempts to build an Islamic center two blocks away from the site of the 911 attacks. Dr. Auda is also a member of the IIIT Academic Council and a founding member of theInternational Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS), headed by Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi and whose board of directors is comprised of many leaders of the Global Brotherhood. Dr. Auda is currently the Deputy Director of the Research Center for Islamic Legislation and Ethics, headed by Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood and a Global Muslim Brotherhood leader in his own right.

Dr. Sinanovic has also been featured at other IIIT events and the UK branch of IIIT recently announced that he will be teaching at a summer school from 24 August – 7 September 2013 in Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina. A flyer about the program indicates that the major speaker at the IIIT Bosnian summer school will be Tariq Ramadan. Dr. Sinanovic is also one of the founding members of the Bosniak Academy of Sciences and Arts, closely associated with Mustafa Ceric, the former Grand Mufti of Bosnia and an associate of Youssef Qaradawi. In September 2008, IIIT met with Dr. Ceric to discuss a proposal to a new University in Bosnia with IIIT acting as a consultant.

The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) describes itself as “a private, non-profit, academic, cultural and educational institution, concerned with general issues of Islamic thought and education” and using the slogan “Towards Islamization of Knowledge and Reform of Islamic Thought.” The concept for IIIT was developed at a meeting held in Lugano, Switzerland that was attended by many luminaries of the Global Muslim Brotherhood including Youssef Qaradawi. IIIT was founded in the U.S. in 1980 by U.S. Muslim Brotherhood leaders including Iraqi-born Jamal Barzinji and Hisham Altalib who wished to promote the Islamization of Knowledge as conceived by Ismail Al-Faruqi and who were also early leaders of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). A1991 internal document of the US Muslim Brotherhood, introduced as evidence in the holy Land Foundation trial, included IIIT in “a list of our organizations and organizations of our friends.”

Read it all

Afghanistan: women's rights violate Islamic law and encourages disobedience, say hardline clerics

A woman's right to not wear one is disallowed


Wait, haven't we been told that Islam upholds women's rights, makes them equal in society and that women hold a special place in the family?  Is there a misunderstanding about whether and how sharia law is affected by this legislation, or do the clerics have it right?

“Whatever is against Islamic law, we don’t even need to speak about it”

Well then, 'nuff said.  And don't even think of mentioning the still arriving bags 'o cash that the CIA delivers each week to Karzai.  

From The Washington Post May 18

Conservative Afghan lawmakers block legislation protecting women’s rights

KABUL, Afghanistan — Conservative religious lawmakers in Afghanistan blocked legislation on Saturday aimed at strengthening provisions for women’s freedoms, arguing that parts of it violate Islamic principles and encourage disobedience.

The fierce opposition highlights how tenuous women’s rights remain a dozen years after the ouster of the hard-line Taliban regime, whose strict interpretation of Islam once kept Afghan women virtual prisoners in their homes.
Khalil Ahmad Shaheedzada, a conservative lawmaker for Herat province, said the legislation was withdrawn shortly after being introduced in parliament because of an uproar by religious parties who said parts of the law are un-Islamic.

“Whatever is against Islamic law, we don’t even need to speak about it,” Shaheedzada said.

The Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women has been in effect since 2009, but only by presidential decree. It is being brought before parliament now because lawmaker Fawzia Kofi, a women’s rights activist, wants to cement it with a parliamentary vote to prevent its potential reversal by any future president who might be tempted to repeal it to satisfy hard-line religious parties.

The law criminalizes, among other things, child marriage and forced marriage, and bans “baad,” the traditional practice of exchanging girls and women to settle disputes. It makes domestic violence a crime punishable by up to three years in prison and specifies that rape victims should not face criminal charges for fornication or adultery.

Kofi, who plans to run for president in next year’s elections, said she was disappointed because among those who oppose upgrading the law from presidential decree to legislation passed by parliament are women.

Afghanistan’s parliament has more than 60 female lawmakers, mostly due to constitutional provisions reserving certain seats for women.

There has been spotty enforcement of the law as it stands. A United Nations analysis in late 2011 found only a small percentage of reported crimes against women were pursued by the Afghan government. Between March 2010 and March 2011 — the first full Afghan year the decree was in effect — prosecutors filed criminal charges in only 155 cases, or 7 percent of the total number of crimes reported.

The child marriage ban and the idea of protecting female rape victims from prosecution were particularly heated subjects in Saturday’s parliamentary debate, said Nasirullah Sadiqizada Neli, a conservative lawmaker from Daykundi province.

Neli suggested that removing the custom — common in Afghanistan — of prosecuting raped women for adultery would lead to social chaos, with women freely engaging in extramarital sex safe in the knowledge they could claim rape if caught.

Another lawmaker, Mandavi Abdul Rahmani of Barlkh province, also opposed the law’s rape provision.

“Adultery itself is a crime in Islam, whether it is by force or not,” Rahmani said.

There it is; rape is adultery in Islam.  

Read it all

Boston Marathon jihad update; Tamerlan Tsarnaev met with Chechen jihadist living in US

As the story unfolds we find there are more connections between the brothers and the jihad that should not be named. Now we have jihadists meeting in America, but to profile these enemies based in their common usage of the texts and tenets of Islam would be racist, doncha know.
From the Union Leader May 16 by Pat Grossmith

FBI questions former Chechen rebel living in Manchester about repeated meetings with Boston bomber
MANCHESTER - Boston Marathon suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev went target shooting at a Manchester firing range and met up with an exiled former Chechen rebel living in the Queen City a month before the attack that killed three and wounded more than 260, according to a Voice of America report.

FBI agents on Tuesday searched the Manchester home of Chechnya native Musa Khadzhimuratov, and examined the hard drives on his computers, VOA reported. Police in Manchester confirmed the FBI agents searched Khadzhimuratov's home, according to the story, but Manchester Police Chief David J. Mara said police will not confirm anything because it is not their case.

The FBI, Mara said, also are not commenting on the matter.

At the Manchester apartment building where Khadzhimuratov lives, a woman responding to the buzzer by intercom said Khadzhimuratov was not home and will not be talking to reporters.
A resident who lives at the Eastern Avenue apartment complex said the FBI showed up about 8 a.m. Tuesday and did not leave until late in the afternoon.

Agents dressed in suits were posted at the front and back entrance to the Eastern Avenue apartment building at Hillview Apartments, preventing people from entering the building, she said.

About six other agents wearing white jumpsuits and black gloves entered the apartment where Khadzhimuratov lives with his wife, her parents and two or three children.

"I thought they were exterminators," said the resident. She only realized they were FBI after someone overheard an agent telling one of Khadzhimuratov's children, "Don't get scared. We're FBI and we're going to talk to your father."



Read it all  

Dubai: couple jailed for having consesual sex outside of marriage

Sharia law in action in moderate, modern Dubai.

From GulfNews May 18 by Bassam Za'za

Couple jailed for sex outside marriage in Dubai

Dubai: A couple has been sentenced to a year in jail for sex outside of marriage, after the man’s wife reported them to police.
The man’s wife was in the couple’s marital home in Discovery Gardens on November 29 at the time of the incident. She was in the living room while the pair were in the bedroom.
The hotel manager and his partner pleaded not guilty when they appeared before the Dubai Misdemeanour Court. They said they got married in Ukraine on August 1, 2012 and provided the judge with a copy of their marriage contract.
“It is true that we were having consensual sex… but I was not on good terms with my wife and we had marital problems that were leading us to divorce,” the manager said in court.
Records said the manager provided the judge with Sharia court papers certifying that he divorced his wife in December 2012.

“My husband is a Hindu and he is not allowed to have two wives at the same time. We had agreed to divorce but he was supposed to provide me with housing, which he didn’t. I was staying in the house temporarily until we settled things. When he brought his lover with him, I asked him to kick her out. He didn’t,” the man’s ex-wife said.
The Ukrainian woman is believed to be seven months’ pregnant.
Records said the 35-year-old Indian manager started having sex outside of marriage with his 22-year-old Ukrainian girlfriend in March 2012 while still married to his 32-year-old countrywoman.

Read it all

Monday, May 13, 2013

UAE: Australian woman working at international hotel chain is raped, prosecuted under sharia and spends 8 months in prison

Sharia is supposed to be used on Muslims only.  I wonder how the rulers of the UAE managed to misunderstand Islam?  They didn't...

"She was charged with having illicit sex outside marriage, and thrown in a filthy jail cell for eight months"

This is Islam.

From Yahoo News May 12 by Ross Coulthart

Abandoned
With Dubai emerging as a major stopover point for long haul journeys, five hundred flights a month will deliver over one million of us to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in the next year.

Dubai is being promoted as a luxury high-class paradise in the desert, but the reality is brutally different, as Australian Alicia Gali discovered. Gali took a job in the UAE with one of the world’s biggest hotel chains, Starwood. What happened next makes this story a must-watch for every Australian planning on travelling through the region.

Gali was using her laptop in the hotel’s staff bar when her drink was spiked. She awoke to a nightmare beyond belief: she had been savagely raped by three of her colleagues. Alone and frightened, she took herself to hospital. What Alicia didn’t know is that under the UAE’s strict sharia laws, if the perpetrator does not confess, a rape cannot be convicted without four adult Muslim male witnesses. She was charged with having illicit sex outside marriage, and thrown in a filthy jail cell for eight months.
Now, finally home and struggling to move on with her life, Alicia breaks her silence for the first time...

Read it all

Warning; Graphic Video


I don't know how to tell if this is true or not.  With all the atrocities committed on both sides it is logical to assume this is real, yet we know that anything can be made, photoshopped, manipulated or edited to show whatever one wants.  With that in mind I leave it up to you to decide.  I am inclined to believe it is true, please don't let that color your decision.

The video is only 30 seconds, you have been warned.

From Brown Moses May 12

Video Shows A Member Of The Syrian Opposition Cutting Flesh Of A Corpse, And Apparently Eating It
Frequently during the Syrian conflict there's been videos that claim to show either side committing some sort of war crimes or atrocity. As a general rule I avoid writing about these videos because there's always claims about fakery, a lack of detail beyond what's shown in the video, and so on.

However, a video has been posted today on pro-Assad channels which presents a rare occasion where it's possible gather much more information about the person involved.

The following video shows a man cutting a chuck of flesh, possible an organ, from a corpse, then biting down onto the chunk of flesh at the end of the video (GRAPHIC)

There is more, read it all

Detroit: Saudi Muslim arrested while carrying a pressure cooker and having an altered passport

Just one question; what was he thinking?  How stupid to try and bring a pressure cooker onto a plane while having a passport that has been altered, and being Saudi to boot.  There was no bomb, only the cooker but you have to wonder why...

From the Detroit Free Press May 13 by Tresa Baldas

Saudi traveler with pressure cooker arrested at Detroit Metro Airport

Federal agents arrested a traveler with an altered Saudi Arabian passport at Detroit Metro Airport over the weekend after discovering a pressure cooker in his luggage.

According to a criminal complaint filed Monday in U.S. District Court, passenger Hussain Al Khawahir initially told customs officers he brought the pressure cooker for a nephew at the University of Toledo because pressure cookers aren’t sold in Saudi Arabia, the complaint said. The man then changed his story and admitted his nephew had purchased a pressure cooker in America before, but it “was cheap” and broke after the first use.

A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) enforcement officer read the passenger his Miranda rights and took him into custody.

Al Khawahir is temporarily being detained pending a formal detention hearing, which is scheduled for Tuesday at 1 p.m. in U.S. District Court in Detroit. He is charged with knowingly using an altered Saudi Arabian passport with missing pages and making a false statement to a CBP officer about a pressure cooker found in his possession, all to gain entry into the U.S.

CBP officials and the FBI declined comment.

And it wasn’t just the pressure cooker — a device that was used in last month’s Boston Marathon bombings — that raised red flags for border officials. The man’s passport also caught their attention.

According to the complaint, two customs officers noticed a page had been removed from the Al Khawahir’s passport when he arrived at Detroit Metro on Saturday from Saudi Arabia via Amsterdam. Al Khawahir, who said he would be visiting his nephew in Toledo, said he did not know how the page was removed from the passport, the complaint said.

Was it a page that would have had country entrance/exit stamps on them?  Maybe there would have been stamps from Yemen, or Pakistan, or Iraq.  We may never know.

Al Khawahir told the officers that the passport was locked in a box that only he, his wife and three minor children have access to in his home, the complaint said. His hometown was not listed in court documents.

A minute after being read his Miranda rights, Al Khawahir invoked his right to remain silent, the complaint said.

Temporary marriage; Mut'a in England, it's all about sex

soon-to-be Mr and Mrs Muslim


The shi'a concept of temporary marriage stems from their belief that Muhammad sanctioned it, as per sura 4 verse 24 which gives permission for men and women to enter into agreed upon marriage contracts, where the time and length of the marriage is stipulated, and gifts or money is given in exchange for the marriage.  A dowry, if you will, but some see it as prostitution.

"And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess. [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree to beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise"

Mut'a is not uncommon but it is hidden.  In Britain there are the beginnings of resistance to Islamic practices that clearly violate Western law, but until we can have an open and honest dialogue about the doctrine and tenets of Islam that drive people to engage in mut'a, its use will continue to rise, and and it will contribute to the undercut of British culture until Islam is the only religion.

From the BBC May 13 by Shabnam Mahmood and Catrin Nye

I do... for now. UK Muslims revive temporary marriages

The temporary marriage, or nikah mut'ah, is an ancient Islamic practice that unites man and woman as husband and wife for a limited time. Historically it was used so that a man could have a wife for a short while when travelling long distances. So why are young British Muslims adopting the practice now?

"It allowed us to meet without breaking the bounds of Sharia [Islamic law]. We both wanted to date, to go out for dinner or go shopping and just get to know each other better before getting married, which we wouldn't have been able to do otherwise," says Sara.

She is a 30-year-old pharmacist from Birmingham, a Shia Muslim of Pakistani heritage.'It's basically a contract'

Sara was temporarily married for six months before committing to a full marriage to her partner.

"It's basically a contract. You sit down and stipulate your conditions - for a girl who hasn't been previously married, you do need the father's permission," she said.

"We stipulated the duration, my father's conditions, and I requested what you would call a dowry where the guy gives a gift to the girl. It's simple, straightforward and doesn't take long at all," Sara added.
She is one of a significant number of young British Muslims using a temporary marriage as a way of balancing their religious beliefs with their modern Western lifestyle.

Because of the informal nature of the union there are no official statistics to show how many temporary marriages there are in the UK. But a number of senior Shia Muslim scholars and Muslim student organisations told BBC Asian Network there is something of a revival.'Taboo subject'

There is a sectarian divide among Muslims on temporary marriage. The mut'ah is practised by Shia Muslims while Sunni Muslims generally consider it haram - forbidden.

The mut'ah is particularly popular on university campuses and, according to Omar Farooq Khan, president of the Ahlul Bayt Islamic Society at Bradford University, the practice is on the increase among Shia students.
"Definitely nikah mut'ah is on the rise now due to students becoming more aware about it. Students are educated people so obviously they look around for a solution to their problems from an Islamic perspective," said Mr Khan.

"What else are they going to do? They can't just have a cold shower because it doesn't work and otherwise they just end up doing the haram thing and having a girlfriend or boyfriend. Many people won't talk about it though, because it is still a taboo subject," he added.'Strictly not allowed'

Khola Hassan, a Sunni Muslim and spokesperson for the UK Islamic Sharia Council, says the practice is strictly not allowed. She says it is equal to prostitution because of the time limit applied to the union.

"I have never come across a Sunni scholar, throughout history, who declares mut'ah marriage to be halal," said Mrs Hassan.
"There is no difference between mut'ah marriage and prostitution. There is a time limit on the marriage, and the mahr given as a gift [from the man to the woman] is the equivalent as a payment to a prostitute," she added.

The nikah mut'ah consists of a verbal or written contract in which both parties agree the length of time and conditions for the marriage.

The union can last for a few hours, days, months or years and when the contract ends so does the marriage....


Stipulations such as no hanky panky can be written into the mut'a contract, but that is the same as paying a prostitute to have dinner with you and talk.  Prostitution does not only mean sexual contact, but it is the primary goal of the mut'a.

Read it all

Friday, May 10, 2013

Steven Hawking; a fallen hero

It's a shame one of the worlds smartest people listened to the little voice of Noam Chomsky telling him Jews are evil, Israel is bad and that he should boycott the upcoming Israeli Presidents Conference called "Facing Tomorrow" featuring  major international personalities, attracting thousands of participants and this year celebrating Shimon Peres's 90th birthday.  I have always admired Hawking and have met him in person, this is difficult to accept for me.  It is sad that a great talent succumbs to anti-Israeli propaganda spouted by Chomsky, I hope some reason creeps into the mind of Hawking and he changes his mind.  Some say Hawking is a hypocrite because the software that runs his communications system on his wheelchair is made in Israel by Intel.  I don't really care about that, his compromise on Israel due to a false narrative perpetuated by anti-Israelis is more the damning evidence of his blindness to reality.

I still admire the man, but he has dropped a few rungs on my respect-o-meter.

From the Guardian May 8 by Harriet Sherwood

Stephen Hawking accused of hypocrisy over Israel conference boycott

Stephen Hawking's decision to boycott an Israeli conference in protest at the state's 46-year occupation of Palestine was derided as hypocritical by some, who pointed out that the celebrated scientist and author uses Israeli technology in the computer equipment that allows him to function.

Hawking, 71, has suffered from motor neurone disease for the past 50 years, and relies on a computer-based system to communicate.

According to Shurat HaDin, an Israel law centre which represents victims of terrorism, the equipment has been provided by the hi-tech firm, Intel, since 1997.

"Hawking's decision to join the boycott of Israel is quite hypocritical for an individual who prides himself on his whole intellectual accomplishment. His whole computer-based communications system runs on a chip designed by Israel's Intel team. I suggest if he truly wants to pull out of Israel he should also pull out his Intel Core i7 from his tablet," said Nitsana Darshan-Leitner of Shurat HaDin.

Intel could not be reached for comment, but their website quotes Justin Rattner, chief technology officer, as saying earlier this year: "We have a long-standing relationship with Professor Hawking." He added: "We are very pleased to continue to … work closely with Professor Hawking on improving his personal communication system."

Cambridge University declined to comment on allegations of hypocrisy regarding Hawking's communications system.

• This article was amended on 9 May 2013 to remove a reference to Intel being an Israeli firm. It is a US multinational with bases in Israel.

FBI Most Wanted list; 30 of 32 are jihadists

Overwhelmingly it is Islamic doctrine that drives the 30 on the list, but no one is allowed to say so.  Somehow these 30 will have blame for their actions placed on poverty, lack of assimilation, poverty, lost girlfriend, frustration over the "war against Islam", misunderstanding their religion, poverty, the list is long.  The 30 all espouse Islam as their driving force, does this mean that they are all Islamophobes?  I cannot equate Islam with violence, but they can.  Uh huh.

From the FBI 

Top 30 of 32 from the FBI most wanted list are Muslim

Thursday, May 9, 2013

"The YouTube video was a non-event in Libya"

photo; the Examiner


This is the crux of the biscuit, as Frank Zappa once said, and the only reason we are where we are today.  Senate hearings to find the truth about Benghazi are under way, and the filth from the administration is flying fast and furious.  The man at the center of all this is Greg Hicks, second in command to Ambassador Chris Stevens.  His testimony so far has opened a large can of worms and have made much of the administration uncomfortable and afraid for their jobs.  It has become all to obvious now that the White House lied and people died.

Where was the help requested as the jihad attack unfolded?  Not coming, it was decided and the excuse is that the DoD "...had no units that could have responded in time to counter the attack in Benghazi." Another blow to freedom came when Mark Thompson, a former Marine and official with the State Department's Counterterrorism Bureau requested the deployment of a FEST team, a unit made up of special operations personnel, diplomatic security, intelligence and others.  This request was summarily denied.  At the very least, Hicks said the special forces could have treated the wounded if given the go ahead but that was never considered by our dear leader.  Too close to the election, it is said to do anything that might bring light to a graven cover-up that took the lives of four Americans.

For  all the wrong reasons the administration choose to ignore not just the pleas for help during the attack that killed the Ambassador, but the requests from months previous asking for beefed up security; the reason for not doing so always based in the belief that the less the embassy looked fortified, the more the locals would like the people inside.  Presenting the image of a walled fortress was not in the "winning of hearts and minds" scenario and for this politically correct viewpoint men died.  

The plan was to ignore the jihad/Islam aspect and instead concentrate on how to spin it ahead of the election in November.  Blaming the attack on an obscure anti-Islam video on YouTube was convenient but futile, they must have known the real facts would come out sooner or later, although the intimidation of witnesses before and during the hearing, including Greg Hicks does point strongly to the WH wanting to squelch, in the strongest terms any facts that would show them to be the lying bastards they are.

After a careful investigation by those who have everything to lose, this statement was released, see if it makes you feel any better, "Citing its internal review, the statement noted the review "found no evidence of any undue delays in decision making or denial of support from Washington or from the military combatant commanders"  What else would you expect from the mouths of those who sent Susan Rice to the Sunday pundit shows, spouting the party line about how it was the fault of the video, and how it was just a little protest that turned ugly.  The wagons have been circled and positions taken, the problem is there are a few wagons on fire and gaps are beginning to appear.  Soon there will be two wagons left and they will have to keep moving to the left to keep the circle together.

 Greg Hicks is the biggest thorn in the side of Obama that he will ever have to deal with.  His testimony, as gruesome as it is, is a direct result of the White House policy that forbids talking about Islam in a way that connects it with violence.  All training material used by the DoD and the military to teach Islamic fundamentalism has been scrubbed, and only those who spout the dogma that Islam is a religion of peace, and the violence is perpetrated by a tiny minority of extremists who seriously misunderstand the teachings of Islam are allowed to instruct.  The result of this deliberate choice to refuse to call the enemy by the name that dare not be uttered is to remove any possibility of actually defeating that enemy.  

Libyan President Magariaf, the day before Susan Rice opened her mouth on national TV, made public the fact that the attack had been premeditated and carried out by jihadists.  He was furious at our attempt to portray the attack as a response to a stupid video, and a full two weeks later he was still steaming about it.  We could have asked Magariaf who the culprits were, but even then I doubt we would have the balls to call it as it really is, even when Islam itself calls it as it is.  Our inability to put on the big boy pants and take responsibility for our actions only serves to make us look even more barbaric to our enemies, adding to their zeal to destroy us.

Watergate caused a sitting president to resign, and that was only about some bungling burglars and the attempt to influence an election.  No one died.  Nixon stepped down as a courtesy to the American people; he knew he had no more gravitas and the healing of the nation was more important than his pride and ego.  We can debate this point all day long, the fact that he resigned with no loss of life is to be respected.  Obama lied and people died, yet he still insists to remain president.  He made a statement recently that maybe he should pack up and go home.  More prescient words have never been spoken.  He should heed his own advice, for the good of America, of course.

 Hillary Clinton is done, the fork can be pulled out and she can be served to the people she screwed.  By saying the truth about Benghazi didn't matter she effectively said screw you to the American people.  For the SCOTUS to ignore the truth about the murder of four American citizens, one of whom was her direct employee is a national disgrace.  She blatantly and with no conscience whatsoever scuttled any chance at more political facetime, and with it any hope of the presidency.  Rightly so, and the sooner she drops from the scene the better.  She resigned right soon after the murders, and I am guessing she was hoping that enough time would pass before the serious questions began to be asked, at which time she would be long out of any loop for testifying.  Maybe that would have spared some hurt feelings, but in the end it is the truth which brings down the powerful, and it also sets us free.

The truth regarding the deaths of Chris Stevens and those who tried to protect him, and themselves is coming to light.  Despite the threats, lies, coercion and strong-arming of the truth-tellers we will know what happened and why.  When the dust settles, I hope for the sake of our national psyche there are impeachment hearings for Obama, arrest and trial for others, and final justice for Stevens and all those who have suffered under the deceit and cover-up this administration has perpetrated.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

New jihad magazine now online called "Azan" with first issue now available

ht azan magazine jef 130508 wblog New Terrorist Magazine Targets Obama, Drones


First it was "Inspire", the online jihad magazine with the article the Tzarnaev Brothers used to construct the Boston marahon bombs called "How to Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of your Mom".  Now we have "Azan", the next publication devoted exclusively to killing non-Muslims, and in its premier issue we find a call to hack American drones and kill Obama.  What a lovely religion of peace Islam is.

Here are two articles;

From RT May 7

New English-language jihadi publication calls on Muslims to hack US drones

A new magazine set up by Islamist radicals in Afghanistan and Pakistan is appealing to Muslims of the world to collaborate in developing new methods and technology to undermine American drone operations.

Publishing under the title “Azan,” the magazine’s first edition became available on May 5, according to the SITE intelligence group. The sprawling 80-page issue includes a lengthy section that evaluates drone strikes while making the case for a mass movement to undermine their impact.

The editorial calls for assistance against drones as a “sacred duty” of the Ummah, or the Muslim community.
“These drones can be hacked and manipulated as evidenced by the efforts of the Iraq Mujahideen. Furthermore, they can be destroyed using various technologies that the Mujahideen are working on. But the Muslims of the world must question themselves as to what role they are playing in helping these innocent Muslims with the abilities that Allah Has Given them. This is a call to anyone in the Islamic Ummah with knowledge, expertise and theories regarding anti-drone technology.”
The hacking to which the article refers is a 2009 incident in which Iraqi insurgents evidently deployed commercial software called SkyGrabber to tap into live video feeds put out by US Predator drones in Iraqi airspace.

The story, originally reported by the Wall Street Journal, attributed the exploit to Iranian-backed militants. At the time, the report also suggested that drones in Afghanistan had been exploited in the same manner.
"Any opinions, thoughts, ideas and practical implementations to defeat this drone technology must be communicated to us as early as possible because these would aid the Ummah greatly in its war against the Crusader-Zionist enemy," reads the entreaty by the magazine's editors.

And also there is this from ABC May 8 by Rym Momtaz

New Terrorist Magazine Targets Obama, Drones

President Barack Obama appears with a bull’s-eye on his head in a new English-language magazine published online apparently by Islamist militants, who also urge Muslims around the world to try to hack and manipulate American drones.

“Wanted Dead Only. Barack Obama Mass Murderer. Reward: in the Hereafter,” reads the full page poster that depicts a darkened image Obama as a target.

Elsewhere in the 80-page tome, the magazine calls upon the “Ummah,” the community of Muslims all over the world, to hack and manipulate U.S. drones, identifying drone attacks as “one of the utmost important issues that the Ummah must unite to come up with an answer to.”

“This is a call to anyone in the Islamic Ummah with knowledge, expertise and theories regarding anti-drone technology. [...] These drones can be hacked and manipulated as evidenced by the efforts of the Iraq Mujahideen” says the article, possibly in reference to the reported interception of video feeds from U.S. predator drones by Iraqi militants in 2009....

Read them all

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

A little humor leitmotif for your day



Sometimes we need to laugh loud and long, thus I present this satire piece for your amusement.  Enjoy some needed chuckle time.

Thanks to my dear friend Billy Rojas.

From The Wadiyan March 8

ISLAMIC CITY COUNCIL BANS FEMALE FLATULENCE IN INDONESIA

An Islamic city council in the Indonesian province of Aceh, which follows Sharia, has banned female citizens from passing gas.

Sayyid Yahia, mayor of the city, told media that a ban was needed, as farting does not go well with the Islamic values of modesty. “Muslim women are not allowed to fart with sound, it’s against Islamic teachings,” he said. Meanwhile, the Indonesian Feminists Association told local media they will attempt to block the smelly law as they deem it discriminatory.
Talking to The Wadiyan, mayor Sayyid Yahia said the law aims to save people’s morals and behaviors. “When you see woman fart loud, she appears like a man. But if she sit sideways and pass it quietly, she looks like a woman,” Sayyid said.

Although the proposed law does not ban “quiet fart,” passing gas with sound is actually not uncommon in Southeast Asia, particularly for women consuming potatoes and peas. Obviously, women maintain that they feel healthier, farting loud. Fathima Khan, a medical doctor at the Al Banni Islamic Hospital in Aceh’s capital is critical of the proposed law: “There is no need to question this practice, let alone regulate it, because people do it for their health and safety,” she said.

The mayor declined to give The Wadiyan details of what the punishment would be for violators. While another member at the City council, who wished not to be named, said if convicted by the sharia court, the offender could receive 20 lashes for small farts and up to 3 months prison time for larger ones...

Read it all

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Latest PEW research poll shows majority Muslims approve of sharia

A hat tip to my friend, who I will call "Mr J" who sent me the original poll results which you can find here.  The results boil down to this; a majority of Muslims worldwide approve of the implementation of the sharia, with the usual countries heading the list; Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia and Nigeria.  Iran and Saudi Arabia are too obvious to list but are part of the greater adherence to sharia that is spreading globally.  It is disappointing to see the results, even moreso that the greater umma does not stand in unison to denounce these results, but also to take back Islam from those who represent it in a negative light.  If Islam is really a religion of peace then Muslims en masse should be taking to the streets.  It seems the numbers from PEW belie the narrative that Islam is the same as Christianity or Judaism.

From the American Thinker May 4 by Andrew Bostom

Sharia Über Alles
Despite a number of (deliberately?) mitigating biases, both methodological and interpretative, the latest Pew Research Forum report, "The World's Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society," released April 30, 2013, confirms the broad appeal of the totalitarian Sharia, Islam's religio-political "law," across Islamdom.
The data were pooled from surveys conducted between 2008 and 2012, representing, as touted by Pew, "a total of 39 countries and territories on three continents: Africa, Asia and Europe." Collectively, the surveys included "more than 38,000 face-to-face interviews in 80-plus languages and dialects, covering every country that has more than 10 million Muslims." Pew did acknowledge this important caveat about Muslim populations not surveyed because, "political sensitivities or security concerns prevented opinion research among Muslims." Notably excluded countries were Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, and Iran -- all Islamic states, governed by the Sharia, Saudi Arabia and the Sudan under Sunni Islam, the third, Iran, being the world's largest Shiite Muslim state.
Responses to four related questions on the Sharia, comprise the surveys' salient -- and pathognomonic -- findings. The questions were, "Do you favor or oppose making sharia law, or Islamic law, the official law of the land in our country?", and these three internally validating (and equally edifying) queries, "Do you favor or oppose the following: punishments like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery?", "Do you favor or oppose the following: punishments like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery?", "Do you favor or oppose the following: the death penalty for people who leave the Muslim religion?" Summary data from the nations with the five largest Muslim populations (as per 2010) surveyed, Indonesia (204 million), Pakistan (178 million), Bengladesh (149 million), Egypt (80 million), and Nigeria (76 million), revealed:
• 72% of Indonesian Muslims, 84% of Pakistani Muslims, 82% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 74% of Egyptian Muslims, and 71% of Nigerian Muslims supported making Sharia the official state law of their respective societies. The population-weighted average from these 5 countries was 77% supportive. (Composite regional data confirmed these individual country trends -- 84% of South Asian Muslims, 77% of Southeast Asian Muslims, 74% of Middle Eastern/North African Muslims, and 64% of Sub-Saharan African Muslims favored application of the Sharia as official state law.)
• 37% of Indonesian Muslims, 85% of Pakistani Muslims, 50% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 70% of Egyptian Muslims, and 45% of Nigerian Muslims favored Sharia-based mandatory ("hadd") punishments "like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery"
• 42% of Indonesian Muslims, 86% of Pakistani Muslims, 54% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 80% of Egyptian Muslims, and 37% of Nigerian Muslims favored the Sharia-based hadd punishment of stoning for adultery

• 16% of Indonesian Muslims, 75% of Pakistani Muslims, 43% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 88% of Egyptian Muslims, and 29% of Nigerian Muslims favored the Sharia-based hadd punishment of execution for "apostasy"
Furthermore, the Pew survey results confirm the abject failure of the U.S. midwifed Iraqi and Afghan "democracies" to fulfill the utopian aspirations of the much ballyhooed "(BernardLewis doctrine." Instead, the negative prognostications, epitomized by my colleague Diana West's evocative description "Making the world safe for Sharia," have been realized. Specifically, the Pew data indicated:
• 91% of Iraqi Muslims and 99% of Afghan Muslims supported making Sharia the official state law of their respective societies
• 55% of Iraqi Muslims and 81% of Afghan Muslims favored Sharia-based hadd punishments "like whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery"
• 57% of Iraqi Muslims and 84% of Afghan Muslims favored the Sharia-based hadd punishment of stoning for adultery
• 42% of Iraqi Muslims and 79% of Afghan Muslims favored the Sharia-based hadd punishment of execution for "apostasy"
Religious piety, as evidenced by frequency of prayer and "Following the Prophet's Example," increased support for Sharia, which was unaffected by age, gender, or educational level.
The Pew report fails to elaborate on these strong associations, offering no explanation about why increased compliance with prayer and pious conformity with the behavior of Islam's prophet Muhammad might result in broad Muslim approval for mutilating thieves, stoning adulterers to death, or executing those who simply exercise freedom of conscience and forsake Islam. Yet the Pew investigators readily proffer these mollifying comments, insisting the predilection for Sharia "varies widely," noting "many favor democracy over authoritarian rule," and even concluding,
Overall, Muslims broadly support the idea of religious freedom. Among Muslims who say people of different religions are very free to practice their faith, three-quarters or more in each country say this is a good thing.
First, even the Pew data on Muslim support for "killing" apostates do not reflect sentiments for the less draconian punishments for apostasy: imprisonment with beatings (for women under Shiite law, timed to each of the prayer sessions, i.e., 5 times per day) until "recantation"; dissolution of marriage and both parental and property rights. These adjunct non-lethal "punishments" -- often applied to "private" apostates who do not manifest their apostasy in public -- would likely have registered far more "popular" appeal. Also, both "religious freedom" and "freedom" -- ("hurriyya"; discussed below) in Islamdom bear no resemblance to Western conceptions of these ideals, as this ranking of Christian persecution -- dominated by countries from sub-Saharan Africa (where 94% affirmed to Pew "it is good that others are very free to practice their faith" ) and the Middle East/North Africa (where 85% affirmed to Pew "it is good that others are very free to practice their faith") -- makes plain.
Furthermore, the current Pew report includes no data on "blasphemy," i.e., a simple question about Muslim attitudes toward public criticism of Islam's prophet or the creed itself by both non-Muslims and Muslims, ignoring Pew's own August, 2011 data from its analysis, "Rising Restrictions on Religion." This report, released August 9, 2011, examined the issue of "defamation" of religion, tracking countries where various blasphemy, or criticism of religions are enforced. "While such laws are sometimes promoted as a way to protect religion, in practice, they often serve to punish religious minorities whose beliefs are deemed unorthodox or heretical," the report noted.

There is more, read it all