Friday, June 10, 2011

Napolitano: start profiling 35-year old Muslim males....wait, what?

Oh to see that kind of clear thinking and clarity of thought from those charged to protect us.  Alas, the DHS and Napolitano are even more clueless than you would believe, with this statement coming from her majesty herself "...we often times...we won't not do what is called a secondary inspection just because they are a 35-year- old male who appears to be Muslim, whatever that means..."

What qualifies her for this job?  Was anyone asking questions about her knowledge, and her sanity when she was vetted to run the DHS? 

This is madness.

From Real Clear Politics June 9

Napolitano: No "Logic" In Profiling Muslim Men Under The Age Of 35 

"You're not using good logic there. You've got to use actual intelligence that you received. And, so, you might -- all you've given me is a kind of status. You have not given me a technique for tactic or behavior. Something that would suggest somebody is not Muslim, but Islamic, that has actually moved into the category of violent extremists," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said at a forum on U.S. security and preventing terrorist attacks.

Does she even know about Islam or it's doctrine?  Has she a clue about Muhammad, sharia or the Qur'an?  WTF!! 

"We have ways to make some of those cuts. And they involve the intel that comes in, the analysis that goes on. For example, we often times, for travelers entering the United States, we won't not do what is called a secondary inspection just because they are a 35-year- old male who appears to be Muslim, whatever that means. But we know from intelligence that if they have a certain travel pattern over a certain period of time, that should cause us to ask some more significant questions than if we don't."

Don't ask questions based in Islamic texts and tenets, don't learn to identify certain answers as potentially deadly, don't bother to understand the theology behind Islam and above all, don't ask anything which would insult Muslims.  Just look at travel patterns and use that as the primary criteria to determine if someone deserves closer scrunity.  And for this forward thinking we the taxpayers foot her salary.

1 comment:

A Christian Woman Who Has Lived Under Shariah said...

I don't believe that Janet Napolitano or any of the other Obama minions are clueless. I believe that those in the upper echelons of the Obama regime know exactly what they are doing and are deliberately vague and deceptive.
The Department of Homeland Security is too busy looking for right wing extremists and has no time or need to look for Islamic terrorists. Napolitano's “Rightwing Extremism Policy,” is described in the recently publicized Intelligence Assessment, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment". The Report specifically mentions the following political beliefs that law enforcement should use to determine whether someone is a “rightwing extremist”:
Opposes restrictions on firearms
Opposes lax immigration
Opposes the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs
Opposes continuation of free trade agreements
Opposes same-sex marriage
Has paranoia of foreign regimes
Fear of Communist regimes
Opposes one world government
Bemoans the decline of U.S. stature in the world.
Upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India
and the list goes on...
These are the folks that the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano and the Obama regime deem as dangerous. Those pesky Muslims flying airplanes into skyscrapers apparently are just figments of our collective imaginations.