cartoon1

cartoon1

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

I'll take Islamophobia for $300, Alex

Islamophobia, as defined today by the progressive left is a fear or Muslims, or moreso an unrequited angst over false beliefs.  A phobia, as per any dictonary is an irrational fear of the unknown.  Is the term a fair application to those who question Islamic doctrine, or is it a method to squelch any narrative which asks critical questions and demands truthful answers?

For those who use Islamophobia as a label to tar their opponents, there are equal the number of those who take the moniker as a badge of honor, using it to raise the flag and institute debate about Islam.  It would appear that those who believe Islamophobes are a threat to interfaith dialogue, bridge-building and tolerance are themselves the real Islamophobes, as their denial of free speech on Islam, and their demands to stop all inquiry into Islamic texts and tenets is part of the public "unawareness" campaign designed to stop all debate on Islam.  Those who support the idea of Islamophobia are the ones truly frightened of what Islam is.

There are two articles today which explore both sides of the "Islamophobia debate".  The first, from Max Blumenthal at TomDispatch.com Dec 19 tries to make the case that there is no good Islamophobe, that the clarion calls about the dangers of Islam are just so much smoke and mirrors, and those who purport to educate on Islam are nothing more than haters, bigots and racists(what race is islam again?).  Max Blumenthal agrees that this anti-Muslim feeling can be blamed on unemployment, housing forclosures, and world-wide recessions.

From Mr. Tom Engelhardt, founder of TomDispatch, "No wonder then that, as hard times hit, as the financial system seemed on the verge of collapse, as unemployment soared and a massive wave of home foreclosures swept into view, increasing numbers of Americans became prey to any wacky explanation for our troubles, none more so than the idea that Islam was somehow responsible, that mosques and Islamic centers meant for a sliver of a minority here were capable of imposing anything, no less a way of life on this country, or that Sharia law (of all things) might somehow worm its way into state legal systems, or that YouTube was a hotbed of terrorism worthy of suppression, or... well, you name it."

Max Blumenthal believes, as does Mr. Engelhardt that the American people, you and I, have become "prey" to "wacky explanations" that Islam has something to do with the encroachment of sharia law, that US mosques could not be in any way hotbeds of jihadist recruiting, and that YouTube could be used for anything other than safe, social intercourse.

Max goes on, er off... "
Little of recent American Islamophobia (with a strong emphasis on the “phobia”) is sheer happenstance.  Years before Tea Party shock troops massed for angry protests outside the proposed site of an Islamic community center in lower Manhattan, representatives of the Israel lobby and the Jewish-American establishment launched a campaign against pro-Palestinian campus activism that would prove a seedbed for everything to come. That campaign quickly -- and perhaps predictably -- morphed into a series of crusades against mosques and Islamic schools which, in turn, attracted an assortment of shady but exceptionally energetic militants into the network’s ranks.

Ah yes, there it is, the Jews are to blame for everything, again.  This tired canard is used as a primary weapon, taqiyya as it were to divert attention from the doctrine of Islam which requires Muslims to "...slay and be slain for Allah..." (9-111), among other wonderfully embracing suras.  Lets not forget to also label any opposition to your opinions as "shock troops" in order to demonize them and show them as nothing more than black-booted thugs mercilessly trampling on the poor Muslim.

Max goes on with paragraph after paragraph, trying to make the case that all of us are "Islamophobic" because we just don't get the whole conspiracy/Zionist/right wing connections.  Read it all to get the full gist of what Max means.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Next we have, from the other side this article from Boston.com Dec 8 by Jeff Jacoby where his explanation of Islamophobia makes much more sense.  Mr. Jacoby says "
When th(e) provocative question "Is America Islamophobic?" appeared on the cover of Time in August (of 2010), the accompanying story strained to imply, on the basis of some anecdotal evidence, that the answer might be yes. The FBIs latest compendium of hate crime statistics from 2009 suggests far more plausibly that the answer is no.

If Islamophobia is rampant across the US, with locals taking up pitchforks and torches, then why are Jews taking the brunt of hate crimes and Muslims are almost at the bottom of the list?  Could it be, there is no rampant Islamophobia?  Hmmmm...

From the Time article
In 2009, according to data gathered from more than 14,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide, there were 1,376 hate crimes motivated by religious bias. Of those, just 9.3 percent — fewer than 1 in 10 — were committed against Muslims. By contrast, 70.1 percent were committed against Jews, 6.9 percent were aimed at Catholics or Protestants, and 8.6 percent targeted other religions. Hate crimes driven by anti-Muslim bigotry were outnumbered nearly 8 to 1 by anti-Semitic crimes.

Mr. Jacoby finishes with this: "But surely the most obvious takeaway from the FBI’s statistics is not that anti-religious hate crimes are so frequent in America. It is that they are so rare.  (...)for American Muslims as for American Jews, the tension and hostility are the exception. America’s exemplary tolerance is the rule."

We are a nation who tolerates behavior which other countries would never allow.  This is, for better or worse what America does regarding those less able, or fortunate than the mainstream.  There is no Islamophobia coarsing through the veins of Americans, rather it is a clear and visceral acceptance that there is something wrong within Islam which needs attention.   

  

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I guess the "class" last night was a dud, eh?

Max's piece is now on the CBS News site and on Huff Po. Great!

Can you tell me why Max, who is Jewish and secular, would engage in 'taqiyya'?

Aren't Zionists to blame for *anything*, in your worldview? And can you tell me what the motto of the Mossad is?

Do you have any clue as to what 'taqiyya' means? (For a clue: http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/08/taqiyya-the-ultimate-intellectual-cop-out/
http://spencerwatch.com/2010/08/15/silencing-spencer-taqiyya-and-kitman-are-part-of-judeo-christian-belief/ )


t is a clear and visceral acceptance that there is something wrong within Barry Sommer which needs attention. Needs it and CRAVES it.

Anonymous said...

Deleted, eh? I guess you're bitter: Spencer gets hundreds of thousands of dollars to peddle mush to gullible folks like you, while you don't get anything. Self-taqiyya at work!

Anonymous said...

I have no hatred of Muslims. I do not hate their religion. I have had several Muslim friends for whom I cared deeply. I don't want to destroy Islam, I want merely to be left in peace, to practice the religion of my choice and to live without fear. That however is NOT the agenda of Muslim extremists. I am aware that there is a reverse kind of prejudice working on the minds and hearts of the American people.
Recently 68 Catholics were murdered by Muslims at the Church of Our Lady of Salvation in Baghdad, Iran. Days later insurgents targeted Christian homes and neighborhoods across the city with a series of bombs. Have you read about those massacres in any but a select few American newspapers? I found the article in the December 23rd issue of USA Today. Local newspapers in Oregon refused to carry the story, stating that publishing the story could "incite anger toward Muslims". That "PC" kind of thinking should not be the standard guiding what can or can not be discussed, what can or can not be published in newspapers or magazines, or what can or can not be taught in our schools. The Political Left loves talking about "inclusion" and "diversity", and those concepts are truly what has made and continues to make America great; but denying dissenting opinions, denying other voices to be part of the debate, and labeling those dissenting voices as "Tea Partyers", "wackos", "Right Wing Extremists" or "Zionists" does nothing but deny ALL Americans a right to be heard. I want TRUTH, plain, unvarnished, unadulterated and unfiltered TRUTH; I don't care if truth is palatable or pretty. The TRUTH is is that there are Muslims in our midst planning the destruction of America and of Christianity. That can NOT be denied. We have the words and the actions of these extremists declaring this to be their objectives. Does that include each and every Muslim? I think not, but the few (or the many) who do feel this way, pose a danger to the United States and its people. Discussing, publishing, and posting these opinions is necessary if we are to remain a free society. We can't be afraid to speak the TRUTH because it might "offend" some segment of our population. Truth is not the possession of a small group of people who decide what the rest of us should know. Truth belongs to ALL. Political correctness deprives us of the truth.