cartoon1

cartoon1

Sunday, January 9, 2011

A reply to Mr. A.R. Bassa on the LCC class

This was sent by a reader who wanted me to see what was being said about the LCC class and myself.  I have pointed out some of the most glaring mistakes and lies, but of course there will be no reply from Mr. Bassa.  This is a great example of how name-calling and ad-hominum attacks take the place of critical discourse.


From Al-Bayan Dec 18 by A.R. Bassa

Bigotry Has
No Place
in Education
by on Dec 18, 2010By A.R. Bassa
Can you imagine a so-called ‘Imperial Wizard’ of the Ku Klux Klan allowed by a community college, or any academic institution even attempting to pass itself off as legitimate, to teach a course in African-American history, without qualification? The school would be unrelentingly condemned worldwide and a mandatory media circus would ensue whether or not it remedied the situation. Good thing nothing like that ever happens, right? I invite you to additionally think along any of the following lines: an unrepentant Serbian war-criminal teaching a Bosnian history course; a proud Turk teaching a course in Armenian history bereft and in denial of genocide; a neo-Nazi teaching a class on ‘What is Judaism?’; or even a high ranking member of the Taliban teaching ‘American-studies’. Unsuspecting students seeking knowledge would only learn ignorance and hate. Perhaps in oppressive societies where minorities are demonized routinely, basic civil liberties cast aside and human rights disregarded, dark hegemonic ideologies can be taught in academia under false guise—not in America of course.

So Mr. A.R Bassa, in his infinite insight into my mind, musters no critical argument against my class except to slot me in with names such as the KKK, Serbian war criminals, An angry Turk, Neo-Nazis and the Taliban.  Name-calling is easy, intellectual debate obviously is not.  He practices from the Saul Alinsky playbook, first demonize, then marginalize, then defeat.  Let’s continue on and see what Mr. Bassa has in his bag of vitriol.
    
Lane Community College, of Oregon’s second largest city, Eugene, was set to offer a non-credit course deceptively titled “What is Islam?” This course was proposed and set to be instructed by a man with no credentials in religious studies or legitimate education in Islam, Barry Sommer. The course was subsequently cancelled, before a session was held, after LCC administrators learned a bit about Sommer and took the right course of action earlier this month. LCC offers around 300 non-credit courses in their Continuing Education program, often led by people other than college staff, aimed at “(enriching) the lives of the residents in and around Lane County,” according to its website. Forming and instructing one of these courses is not hard, there are only a few bureaucratic steps and a minimal number of students willing to register in order to get the course offered.

Here again we see Mr. Bassa making claims based in nothing more than a hatred of anyone speaking critically about Islamic doctrine, texts and tenets.  I have, according to Mr. Bassa no credentials or legitimate education on Islamic doctrine.  If he is referring to the lack of a sheepskin on the wall, saying I passed any religious studies course, he is right.  I have never claimed to be a scholar or an expert, and I will not until I receive my masters and PhD in education, with the major being Middle East and Islamic history.  Yet while excoriating me for a lack of studies, he does not present any evidence that what I say, and the information I present, based in the Qur’an, hadiths, sunna and the behavior and words of jihadists is incorrect in any way.  He merely regurgitates the same leftist/apologist line that since I am not a Muslim, I can know nothing about the religion or how it is defined and practiced today.  Mr. Bassa, where is your evidence that what I say is anti-Muslim?  Show where I have said I am anti-Muslim.      

Sommer resides in a quiet trailer park in the local Eugene-area. He runs an anti-Muslim blog titled “Islam Today Oregon” where he skews news-stories regarding terrorism and Islam to provide only a negative one-sided view of the faith. He also produces a local cable access program similarly titled “Islam Today.” His grammar and spelling are unfit for anyone hoping to teach at a college-level. Browsing through his blog one will notice a myriad of errors. His deplorable English and scholarly-fraud is not limited to his blog; he is also an author of a seemingly self-published online book “From the Mouths of Our Enemies,” which he dedicates affectionately to infamous anti-Muslim blogger Robert Spencer. Similarly to his blog and TV-show, his book is nothing more than faux-scholarly bigotry.  He is unequipped to teach at all, let alone a course on theology he has no grasp on.

What exactly have I written or said which shows my bigoted or racist attitude?  If indeed I have no ability to write and speak clearly and concisely, and am just a faux-scholar, why waste your time trying to discredit me?  It should be easy for me to fall on my own sword if indeed I know not what I say, and yet the information I present is based in the words, deeds and activities of those who claim that Islam is nothing more than a “religion of peace”, thus if there is a problem with the message, the anger should be directed at those who have “hijacked” Islam, not the messenger relaying said statements.  Of course, for Mr. Bassa it is much easier to attack me than take an inward look at his own religion and address how it is presented to the public by those who follow sura 9, verse 111 “…to slay and are slain in the name of Allah…”
 
Aside from being an intellectually-deprived writer, Sommer is also president of the Oregon chapter of a national anti-Muslim hate group known as “ACT! for America. The national group is headed by Brigitte Gabriel, who is quoted as making false claims like “Every practicing Muslim is a radical Muslim,” and “a practicing Muslim who believes the word of the Koran to be the word of Allah, who abides by Islam, who goes to mosque and prays every Friday, who prays five times a day — this practicing Muslim, who believes in the teachings of the Koran, cannot be a loyal citizen to the United States of America.”

How is what Brigitte Gabriel says false?  As Islam is a complete social, religious and political system designed to reinforce a blind and dogmatic following, and that in the Qur’an it says that to be a Muslim means you put loyalty to Islam and Allah above any allegiance to country or society. Where does she get it wrong?  Adherence to Islam prevents allegiance to America, and the Muslim who believes the Qur’an is the perfect word of Allah, and that Muhammad is “al-insan al-kamil” or the perfect man cannot be a 1st citizen of any country.
From just a small glimpse into Barry Sommer’s works and affiliations, it becomes obvious that he would only provide poor instruction and a skewed bias to students of his would-be class had LCC not mended their mistake.  Administrators only realized their mistake after being contacted by a local TV station that Sommer had informed of the course. In a statement provided to another station, KVAL, LCC administration noted that the “noncredit class titled ‘What is Islam’ …reached the attention of administration after a phone call from a local television station…The station had been contacted directly by the person who proposed the course.” They reviewed the course and “determined that it was in the best interest of students and the community to step back, pause for careful consideration, and engage our faculty in how to best provide a rich learning experience,” the statement continued. Additionally LCC’s Continuing Education program describes that “Instructors are practitioners in the subjects they teach,” and Sommer is no practitioner of Islam.

Correct, I am not a Muslim or an Islamist.  I am not a Zoroastrian, or a Methodist, or a Hindu, either.  I am not a working mechanic but I can repair my own car, and show someone how to do the same thing.  Does this qualify me to “teach” mechanics?  To impart knowledge in a manner that most people will understand, is that not the broad definition of a teacher?  Now he says I would provide “poor instruction”, yet earlier he says I have no right to teach at all and that I should not be allowed.  Which is it, Mr. Bassa?  Can I teach poorly, or not at all?
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) learned of Sommer’s proposed course after he sought and recieved media mention for it. They took action immediately issuing a statement to LCC administration as well as a press-release on the matter. The class was, however, cancelled before CAIR’s statement was received.(…)

This is a lie.  Lane Community College cancelled the class AFTER the CAIR press release, I have the emails which prove the timeline, and also the second TV interview done by KEZI came after CAIR demanded the class be cancelled, not before. 

(…) In the statement, CAIR-Washington Executive Director Arsalan Bukhari advised that Sommer be replaced “unless the goal of this course is to promote anti-Muslim bigotry.” Bukhari, in a phone-interview, expressed most concern in Sommer’s education, “I want to see his educational background,” he said, “He’s been claiming that he’s been studying Islam for (more than 10) years,” he continued “There are many ways to study a faith.” The LCC situation “irks us and should irk every rational person,” Bukhari expressed.“In mainstream society we don’t want bigotry in education. It shouldn’t be acceptable to have people who hate Islam, teach it. That’s not education.”

Again I ask anyone to show where I say I hate Muslims.  Any spoken word, any written word, anything pointing to my statement that I hate Muslims.  Mr. Bukhari says there are many ways to study a faith, and he is right.  Would it interest him to know that I have 4 copies of the Qur’an, copies of Bukhari’s hadiths, many publications from Islamic sources such as the IIIT, ISNA, ICNA, Muslim Brotherhood as well as treatises from Qaradawi, Tantawi, Sistani, Ali-Goma’a and other recognized Islamic scholars?  I doubt it, as he seems only capable of flinging invectives instead of engaging in critical debate on Islamic doctrine. 
In answering whether he hated Islam to a local reporter, Sommer replied “That’s kind of a loaded question…I have absolutely nothing against Muslims, but I have a problem on how Islam is defined today by its leaders.” Unfortunately Sommer believes that 1.57 billion Muslims today are led by the minuscule percentage of radicals responsible for about 6% of terrorism in the US and .4% in Europe, according to the FBI and Europol respectively.(…)

No, the accusation that I believe Muslims are being led by a “tiny minority of extremists” is an assumption made to mislead the reader.  The leaders of Islam today, those who define and clarify Islamic doctrine: Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Ali-Goma’a, Sistani, Osama bin-Laden, Zawahiri, Tantawi all uphold violent jihad as a requirement for all Muslims, define Islam as the only religion to be practiced on earth, see any non-Muslim as a threat to their existence and continually exhort Muslims to “…kill in the name of Allah until his religion is the only on earth…”(2-190/193)

 This fetish for misleading people about Islam is most definitely rooted in a deep-seated hatred for it. It’s harrowing that he almost got away with producing institutionalized Islamophobia but somewhat comforting that his efforts were ultimately thwarted. Sommer is not giving up easily though, and the American Center for Law and Justice is threatening LCC with legal action on his behalf; the right-wing legal-group wants Sommer and his course reinstated.  The ACLJ’s threats are baseless as they are under the false impression that LCC’s decision was pressured by CAIR, though LCC administration asserts that their decision was entirely through internal review.

Again they repeat the lie, expecting you to buy it without any second thought, or simple research into the question. 

This situation at LCC is merely a footnote in the rising tide of anti-Muslim sentiment enveloping America, and many nations in Europe. Bukhari believes that Muslims should be vocal in defense against this, “Stand up for your rights, take a stand,” he advised; promoting writing op-ed articles, letters-to-the-editor, and comments on online news relating to Islam. “There are basically organizations, groups, out there that have interns or volunteers go (online) and comment (falsely) on articles about Islam” he warned; further recommending “(getting) maybe 10 Muslims to go debunk negative commentators.” Bukhari stressed the importance of media involvement, he continued to advise “(responding) to reporters, write positive letters to reporters to balance the negativity” they receive from bigots, when they do fair articles about Islam. “It has a huge impact and it’s very easy to do,” he added “Mainstream discourse is off, our job is to respond to that, to make sure our narrative gets out.”

I have a suggestion, instead of demonizing those who speak critically about Islamic doctrine, go after those who are directly responsible for how Islam is seen by non-Muslims.    The Ft. Hood shooter, the Christmas bomber in Portland, OR and Detroit a couple years ago, Baltimore recently, the Swedish bomber, Or even Mumbai, London, Madrid, 9-11.  All examples of how those who follow the example of Muhammad have got it wrong, wrong, wrong.
Fix that, Mr. Bassa and we can begin to think of Islam as something other than a “religion of BOOM!”



1 comment:

Anonymous said...

CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS?

Theologically - No....
Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia .

Religiously - No....
Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah Except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran) (including humanists)

Scripturally - No....
Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically - No....
Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - No....
Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews or non-Muslims (including humanists)

Politically - No....
Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual Leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domestically - No....
Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 )

Intellectually - No....
Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. (including humanists)

Philosophically - No....
Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and Expression (including humanists). Democracy and Islam cannot Co-exist. Every Muslim Government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - No....
Because when we declare 'one nation under God, the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran's 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation....

Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - -
They obviously CAN NOT BE BOTH 'Good' Muslims and Good Americans'
Call it what you wish it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.

The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. ....

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.


SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE

----TO CHECK THIS OUT IN THE QUARAN GO HERE------
http://members.peak.org/~jmw/Can_A_Muslim/