The latest FBI stats are out for 2010, and once again they show clearly that there is no Islamophobia. There is no rampant hatred of Muslims, no mobs of angry peasants with pitchforks and torches rounding up innocent Muslims and burning them at the stake. Would you like to guess the group suffering under the greatest number of religious hate crimes?
It has become an accepted trope of contemporary journalism that American Muslims are under siege and beset by hatred and prejudice. But the evidence for this conventional wisdom is lacking. The story line of Muslim persecution in the United States has always been a matter of anecdotes and perception, not facts.
That truth was confirmed this week when the FBI released theirannual crime statistics reportwhich showed once again that hate crimes against Muslims remain rare and are far outnumbered by attacks on Jews.
The report is not perfect, since not all parts of the country do a good job compiling the data, but it provides an important snapshot of the state of the nation regarding bias crimes. But the numbers speak for themselves. In 2010, only 13.2 percent of religion-based attacks were directed at Muslims. By comparison, 65.4 percent of such crimes were directed at Jews. This shows a slight increase over the last two years (the raw numbers show 887 anti-Jewish attacks with only 160 anti-Muslim attacks), but is not a statistical fluke.
In 2009, the FBI reportedthat 70.1 percent of religious-based hate crimes were anti-Jewish while only 9.3 percent were anti-Islamic.In 2008, the FBI said66.1 percent were anti-Jewish while 7.5 percent were anti-Muslim. This has been true of every year in the past decade, even in 2001 when anti-Muslim crime spiked in the wake of 9/11.
For all of the breast-beating about Islamophobia in this country, anti-Semitism remains a far greater problem.
As I wrote last year whenI debunked the mythical backlash against Muslimsin an article in the October 2010 issue of COMMENTARY,the notion of a rising wave of hatred against Muslims is unsupported by any statistical research. When you consider that Muslims claim to have about the same number of adherents in this country as Jews and that anti-Jewish crimes have always far outnumbered those committed against Muslims, the media hysteria about Islamophobia is exposed as a big lie. Buteven if there are fewer Muslims here than their groups claim, the conclusion is unchanged.
Because the far greater number of attacks on Jews is not viewed (even by those groups dedicated to monitoring anti-Semitism such as the Anti-Defamation League) as proof the country is boiling with hatred for Jews, how can anyone rationally argue that the far fewer number of assaults on Muslims can justify the conclusion that Islamophobia is rampant?
Anyone care to answer this one? Hooper? Aslan? Mogahed? Armstrong? Anybody?