Should he or Shouldn't he?

Rep. Pete King has been one of the few in our government speaking about Islam and sharia.  He has begun to investigate the threat of Islam, and would like to hold hearings to open up the dialogue of Islam in America.

Now with the shooting in Tucson, Rep. King is being pressured by Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison to drop his investigations into Islamic supremacy.  You don't think this would have anything to do with the favt that Ellison is a Muslim, do you?


From The Washington Post Dec 10 by Jeff Stein

Tucson should make Rep. King rethink Muslim probe

The shooting in Tucson offers Rep. Peter T. King (R-N.Y.) an opportunity to rethink his planned Homeland Security Committee hearings on Muslim “radicalization” in this country.

King says he's worried about the “disconnect,” as he calls it, “between outstanding Muslims who contribute so much to the future of our country and those leaders who--for whatever reason--acquiesce in terror or ignore the threat.”

Yep.

(.)King's announcement of hearings last month proved incendiary, with law-abiding U.S. Islamic groups and such prominent individuals as Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim elected to Congress, protesting that such an attention-getting forum will only further “vilify” them.

No, it is jihadists such as Major Hassan at Ft. Hood, or Mohamed Mohamud in Portland, Oregon or Madrid, or London and all the others who "vilify" Muslims.

"I got so concerned that when I heard about it I actually approached Congressman King on the House floor and told him that, you know, look, we all need to be concerned about violent radicalization, but not just against Muslims, against anybody," Ellison said on MSNBC. “What about the guy who flew a plane into the IRS or what about the guy who killed a guard at the Holocaust museum?”

What about them?  Cheap moral relativism at work by a member of congress.

Read it all