cartoon1

cartoon1

Friday, December 3, 2010

Censorship, CAIR Style

To my friends, opponents, and the undecided,
   Since my interview on KEZI yesterday, I have been having one heck of a ride.  The fact that CAIR, an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation/Hamas money laundering scheme, purveyor of fake Muslim hate crimes, who’s upper echelon members are now in prison for supporting jihadists, wants me out of the classroom because I might speak the truth about Islam, says volumes about how, as I have pointed out Islam is fearful of people finding out some ugly truths.  No matter what you say, if it is critical of Islam, you have no credibility, thus to be ignored or marginalized.  If any belief is so weak that it cannot stand the brunt of critical debate, then just how strong is that belief anyway?
   No one asked me what my course syllabus was, or even seemed to care.  It was assumed, from this blog and my TV show that I must be an Islamophobe, bigot, racist (what race is Islam again?) anti-Muslim, fearmonger and the host of invectives that comes with questioning the “religion of peace”.  Yet the syllabus I have prepared is a scholarly, historically accurate narrative of Islam, Muhammad, the Qur’an, jihad, sharia and other aspects of Islam.  I have been condemned not because of what I had already taught, but what CAIR thought I would teach.  The school, Lane Community College, being the good dhimmi, cancelled the class, virtually immediately after CAIR issued their press release.  I have no explanation from LCC on the reason for the cancellation, merely a terse email stating the class was no more. 
     Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR issued the statement condemning me, yet let’s not forget that it is Mr. Hooper who has stated publically that he would like to see Islam take over the US sometime in the future.  Hooper, when asked point-blank, will not condemn Hamas or Hizballah as terrorist groups.
   This is the group trying….no, succeeding in preventing me from educating on Islam, all aspects of Islam to a world hungry for more dialogue on a very pressing problem.  My free speech rights have been negated in favor of Muslim comfort, and as part of the continuing effort to silence any debate or discussion of Islam in a critical way.
   The class has been cancelled for now.  Things are in the works, however your support is greatly needed.  Please join act4america, or at least get on their email list, and follow my story.  This promises to be a very big deal, and I want you to see how Islamic doctrine plays in all this.  Watch for spin, mis-information, lies, empty accusations, obfuscation and other methods of distraction.
   Stay strong, CAIR is not impervious to damage.  We can and will succeed.

God bless everyone.

12 comments:

The Atomic Fruitbat said...

Didn't you *just* put up a post endorsing the idea of amending the US Constitution to remove freedom of religion... but just for Muslims? Yeah, it's a real mystery how LCC could have gotten the idea that you're biased. Must be an Islamofascist conspiracy! Quick, look under the beds! They're everywhere!

Unknown said...

hey...atomic fruitbat....are you implying islam is a religion??? if so....what a dork you are...lol

The Atomic Fruitbat said...

Yes, I'd absolutely say that Islam is a religion. And yes, I'm a complete dork for doing foolish things like "using the English language correctly" and "calling things by their proper names."

Of course, I blame my upbringing; after all, I was raised on Earth, where words have meanings.

Where might you be from, James?

Van Grungy said...

Fruit,

What is the public good as proscribed by mohammad?

Ban islam

The Atomic Fruitbat said...

Van Grungy,

Hey, Van Grungy, are you and James related? I ask because it seems you both went to the same primary school; neither of you appear to understand the meanings of common English words. Go look up "proscribed" in the dictionary and then practice saying things that make sense.

Thanks so much for trying, though.

Anonymous said...

The hallmark of a cult is a penalty for leaving, Islam imposes the ultimate penalty, “Death”

The ongoing RIDDA (ارتداد, irtidād) wars continue this very day:


c2.5 The unlawful (haram) is what the Law-giver strictly forbids. Someone who commits an unlawful act deserves punishment, while one who refrains from it out of obedience to the command of Allah is rewarded.
(3) and unbelief (Kufr), sins which put one beyond the pale of Islam (as discussed at o8.7) and necessitate stating the Testification of Faith (Shahada)…
o8.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed
(A: though if there is no Caliph (def: o25), no permission is required.
o8.7 (2) to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or not: one therby immediately commits unbelief:
(The Reliance of the Traveller)

Anonymous said...

@Fruitbat - The theology and legal system of Islam codified by Sharia with Muhammad as the role model is nothing more than a system of legally-mandated hatred, why defend it?

Nice guy he was, Muhammad advocates the enslavement, robbery, rape, and torture of the Kafiroon:

o4:17 There is no indemnity for killing a non-Muslim…(Kafir)
(Reliance of the Traveller - pgs 588-595)
http://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Traveller-Classic-Islamic-Al-Salik/dp/0915957728

Therefore, the Kafir can be Hated:

They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart. and despised by Allah. (Sura 40:35)

The Kafir can be mocked:

On that day the faithful will mock the kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the kafirs be paid back for what they did? (Sura 83:34)

The Kafir can be punished:

Say to the kafirs: My Lord does not care for you or your prayers. You have rejected the truth, so sooner or later, a punishment will come. (Sura 25:77)

The Kafir can be beheaded:

When you encounter the kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly. (Sura 47:4)

The Kafir can be terrorized:

Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!" (Sura 8:12)

The Kafir can be annihilated:

So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. (Sura 6:45)

The Kafir can be killed:

If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them. (Sura 4:91)

The Kafir can be crucified:

The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to commit mischief (Kufr) on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful. (Sura 5:33)

War should be made on the Kafir:

Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated. (Sura 9:29)

A Muslim should not be friends with the Kafir:

Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah's protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him. (Sura 3:28)

The Atomic Fruitbat said...

Oh, I could criticize Islam and its theology all day; there's plenty there to which one could quite reasonably take offense.

Tell me, though... where do you get the idea that I'm "defending" Islam? Because I disagree with Barry Sommer's wild-eyed paranoia about hundreds of millions of Muslims coming to kill us all? Or because I don't think that stripping citizenship from millions of innocent Americans is a reasonable response to terrorism?

It's not an either-or thing. Turns out, I can be unimpressed with the dogmas of Islam and, at the same time, be unimpressed with Barry Sommer and his fundamentally anti-liberty stances.

Anonymous said...

"-Tell me, though... where do you get the idea that I'm "defending" Islam-" ?

Why slander those who have legitimate concerns about the implications and the consequences of the fascist teachings of Islam? You doing this gives the appearance of defense and merely prevents legitimate criticism and debate about an important global problem. Complacency on the part of the apologist can only serve Islam and lead others into a slumbering acquiescence.

Should Nazism be elevated to religious status?

Islam is a totalitarian political machine of bloodthirsty conquest which zealously advocates the downfall of the U.S. government and may I ask, what tenets of Islam are compatible with the US Constitution?

Islam/Sharia was the driving force behind 9/11, and Islam/Sharia is the driving force behind CAIR - Islam/Sharia is the basis for every demand that Muslims make on our society, like the demands CAIR made of LCC. It is political, not religious.

The concession to Islam itself, by the actions of Lane Community College - are in essence, the establishment of Sharia, by the school choosing to side with an unindicted co-conspirator, CAIR, a willful participant in funding terrorism through {Zakat}.

The display of useful idiocy through moral equivalency is quite disgusting, and Dhimmitude by those who detract from the threat of Sharia actually enable it via an enforced code of silence.

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil."

The Atomic Fruitbat said...

It isn't slander if it's true, Anonymous. And what mechanism, exactly, "prevents legitimate criticism and debate" when I point out that Barry's spouting false and misleading things?

Anonymous said...

You have offered no proof to rebut Barry's facts other than slothful induction, the straw-man, or ad hominem attacks, as well as false dichotomy...

Unknown said...

Fruitbat, If I am unfit to teach, yet by your own claim there is a problem with Islam, then let me asK; who would you choose to teach my class?

Any suggestions?

Names please.