I have written and talked about Sweden for a while, especially Malmo, a city where Islamists have a free reign against those who do anything outside of Muslim norms. As Robert Spencer correctly points out, when non-Mulsims are in a Muslim land, they must conform to Muslim norms. When non-Muslims are in a non-Muslim land, they must conform to Muslim norms. OK, we are straight on that, right?
This latest attack by the religion of peace, in one of the most outspoken bastions of multi-culti acceptance in Europe, has shaken Swedes to their core. Of course, the authorities are playing the "we do not know what caused this attempted bombing" card, trying to downplay the obvious: jihad in the name of Allah.
From the article;
"Although police haven't confirmed Saturday's attack was motivated by Islamist views, an audio file sent to Swedish news agency TT shortly before the blast referred to jihad, Sweden's military presence in Afghanistan and a cartoon by a Swedish artist that depicted the Prophet Muhammad as a dog, enraging many Muslims."
Let us look closely at this statement, and find out what they are really saying. The police will not admit that Islamic doctrine and tenets were the prime motivator in this attack, and that publishing cartoons enraged Muslims but do not look at that as a valid reason for the bombers actions.
Are we to be held responsibile for Muslims feelings? Have we been given the power to control how Muslims behave and react? How can this be, when we bend over backwards to accomodate Muslim sensibilities by providing footbaths at airports, private swimming times for women at public pools, halal food in prisons and Ramadan ceremonies in public schools at taxpayers expense.
This latest attempt to instill Islam into Swedish society by way of the sword (9-29) only serves as another in a long line of wake-up calls, calls which remain unanswered.
Read it all here.